Previous Page  53 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

March 4-March 17, 2015

COLORADO REAL ESTATE JOURNAL

— Page 5B

I

n 1997, a landmark

decision in the case

Hospital Corporation

of America v. Commissioner

determined that businesses

could use cost-segregation

studies to compute depreciation

and, thus, decrease taxable

income.

Based on the ruling, cost-

segregation methodologies

previously used to allocate the

cost of a building between

structural components and

investment tax-credit property

can now be used for depreciable

assets.

By using cost segregation to

differentiate between building

and asset expenses, health care

entities can lower their owed

taxes, thereby increasing cash

flow. For example, rather than

applying a standard 39-year

depreciation to a medical

office building and everything

attached to it, the building

owner or administrator may

apply a shorter schedule

to items such as carpeting,

decorative lighting, specialty

outlets and, in some cases,

utilities. Doing so defers

payment related to their tax

burden and enables them to

retain more cash to put toward

immediate expenses.

To take advantage of cost

segregation, a health care entity

(such as a hospital, doctor’s

office, laboratory or long-term

care facility) must have taxable

income and must have spent

at least $500,000 for one of

three scenarios: purchase of an

existing building, construction

of a new building or completed

major improvements to an

existing property. In all of

these cases, documentation is

extremely important, so owners

and administrators should keep

careful records to share with tax

professionals.

n

Asset eligibility

requirements.

Let’s take a

look at what types of expenses

can and cannot be assigned

a condensed depreciation

schedule. Generally, anything

movable, dedicated to hospital

or business purposes, decorative

or easy to remove can be

considered a five-year asset.

For example, an ornamental

chandelier, though it provides

light, is not necessary for office

functioning, because other

lighting is available; therefore, it

may be considered decorative.

Electrical outlets meant for a

specific purpose that wouldn’t

be needed in a standard office

building (such as in a ceiling

for dental machinery) can be

considered dedicated. Some

plumbing fixtures, such as

emergency eye wash stations,

also can fall into this category.

Carpeting, because it’s easy to

remove, could be eligible for

the shorter tax life, while tile

flooring may not. Standard

lighting and restroom plumbing

that would be needed for any

type of office environment

would likely not be eligible.

Some items, such as power

outlets, may fall into a

questionable territory as they

could be used for dedicated

equipment but also standard

building equipment. Items

considered personal property

or that a business would take

with it if it moved, such as

chairs, tables, sofas, equipment

and computers, would not be

included in a cost-segregation

study.

n

Cost-segregation studies.

The key to determining

which items are eligible for

accelerated depreciation is a

cost-segregation study, which

takes place after construction

or the purchase has been

completed. An engineering-

based study is the most accurate

and effective when identifying

and reclassifying property assets

to shorten the depreciation

time for taxation purposes and

reduce current income tax

obligations. The primary goal

of a cost-segregation study is to

identify all construction-related

costs that can be depreciated

over a shorter tax life than the

39-year building standard.

The criteria for classifying

assets is not always concrete,

so engineers and accountants

who provide this service tend to

use “generally accepted” rules,

rather than one particular code.

Two of our recently

completed cost-segregation

studies illustrate the potential

cost savings.

Medical Office Building

A.

The cost to build Medical

Office Building A in Colorado

was very high because of its

rural location. As a result,

utilities and paving had to be

extended to the area. The total

project cost was $18.5 million.

The engineering-based cost-

segregation study revealed

that $2.5 million of assets –

How entities can use cost segregation to reduce taxable income

Lawrence Knutson,

CPA

Tax partner, EKS&H, Denver

Ryan Sells, CPA

Audit partner, EKS&H, Denver

Typical Expense:

Depreciation:

Specialized wiring

5 year

X-ray shielding

5 year

Internal communications systems

5 year

Dedicated plumbing

5 year

Vinyl wall and floor coverings

5 year

Accordion doors and partitions

5 year

Parking and landscaping, etc.

15 year

Please see Tax, Page 11B