Previous Page  17 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

December 2017 — Office Properties Quarterly —

Page 17

www.crej.com

carpet was chosen to accent small-

er, more strategic areas of polished

concrete.

The tenant was confident enough

to scour showroom floors and

choose some discounted pieces

of sculpture and furniture, which

added to the eclectic style of the

office. Again, the focus here was on

recruitment and retention through

a blend of premium and midrange

products that inspired a creative

and highly mobile staff and man-

agement.

In another case, a building owner

in the same submarket estimated

a lobby renovation to cost approxi-

mately $77 per sf. The new space

would be a mixture of open and

enclosed areas, including new walls

and infrastructure improvements.

The original design called for the

entire ceiling to be opened up in

an expansive lounge/break area. A

custom rotating flat screen/white-

board would add $6 per sf to the

cost. Folding, movable glass doors

enclosing a conference room came

in at another $5.50 per sf. Although

the landlord did retain many of

these improvements, it eliminated

some of the higher-cost alterna-

tives.

Opening a ceiling, for example,

can run $32 per sf or more, includ-

ing new ductwork and suspended

light fixtures. Walls can range from

$125 per sf for drywall to $400 per

sf for full-glass demountable parti-

tions. The point is, there are myriad

products available to support the

build-out of hybrid spaces with

flexible, moveable systems in both

tenant suites and building lob-

bies. And both sides are taking full

advantage of them.

The wild card for tenants is fur-

niture.

Office furniture is rarely included

in the tenant improvement allow-

ance, which can lead to some

startling product choices. It is not

uncommon, for example, for a small

company to purchase IKEA – or sim-

ilar caliber furniture – for portions

of its build-out. While IKEA is a suc-

cessful worldwide brand, it’s just

not the kind of product that will

stand up to the constant wear in an

office environment. Worse, low-end

residential products are standing

in for well-manufactured mobile

brands. Think training room tables

and chairs without wheels. While

this type of tenant – or landlord,

for that matter – may save a buck

on the front end, a cheap product

choice can negate the flexible and

mobile characteristics for which

the space was designed in the first

place. It happens.

Furniture choices are almost limit-

less in today’s office market. Pricing

can range from $18 per sf to $60 per

sf or more. Most reputable manufac-

turers carry multiple lines at com-

petitive prices that meet or exceed

standards for wear. Both tenants

and landlords should bite the bul-

let and invest in those products

designed and tested specifically for

offices and common areas.

In fact, the cliché “you get what

you pay for” holds true for the

entirety of hybrid spaces. There is

enormous value at various levels

among professional product and

service providers. But there also is

a threshold that landlords and ten-

ants should caution not to cross

if the stated goal is well-designed

multiuse space.

s

Market Trends