Previous Page  26 / 136 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 136 Next Page
Page Background

26

/ BUILDING DIALOGUE / DECEMBER 2016

Schoolyard Evolution – More Humane, Interesting

T

here’s one universal constant at any

school: the raucous noise-filled school-

yard – the byproduct from the comings

and goings and children at play. But there’s

been an important evolution on these school-

yards and it’s enriching educational opportuni-

ties and creating safer, healthier environments

for children.

Over the past 35 years, I’ve watched and partic-

ipated in the evolution of schoolyards for many

public and private schools. I’ve seen this evolution

change philosophies and as a result, what were

once large expanses of harsh asphalt and rock, to-

day, these same schoolyards are vibrant extensions

of the educational program.

35 Years Ago

For the most part, schoolyards were simply

thought of as places for before- and after-school

gathering and short breaks for recess and lunch.

They typically had an athletic field for traditional

gym classes during school and sports activities after

school.

Unfortunately though, a great majority of those

schoolyards had sites that were not hospitable and

lacked consideration of alternative uses. Often they

used inadequate and sometimes unsafe materials.

Typically, they were plagued with the following:

• Large expanses of asphalt.

• Playgrounds surfaced with sand or pea gravel,

often at an inadequate depth.

• If there was sod, it rarely had an automatic irri-

gation syste.

• Play equipment was typically bare steel and the

most basic climbers or obstacle-course type equip-

ment.

• Little to no accessibility throughout the site.

Making Change

Thirty-five years ago, our firm began working

with architects and school districts to reconsider

the schoolyard – the evolution has been ongoing

since.

We pushed for safer and healthier sites. We advo-

cated for connections to nature, low-maintenance

sites and smarter uses of water. These ideas were

implemented by incorporating the following:

• Low-use areas planted with native grasses that

required no irrigation in the long-term.

• Native and adapted plant materials.

• Efficient automatic irrigation systems for all

schools.

• Age-separated and easily observed play areas

with upgraded equipment.

Today’s Schoolyards as Learning

Landscapes and So Much More

Since those early years, we have figured out how

to incorporate nature and learning into school-

yards. We participate in the continually growing

national design discussion intertwining nature and

play, incorporating learning into schoolyards, and

design of inclusive playgrounds. Today, 35 years later,

schoolyards often incorporate: outdoor classrooms,

gardens, native plantings, riparian or rain garden

plantings, informal track/trail systems, imagination

play elements, activities or theming that play off of

the curriculum, neighborhood or other elements

that have significance to the school and neighbor-

hood, colorful/imaginative play equipment, play

surfacing that meets accessibility guidelines and

fall attenuation requirements, activities and equip-

ment that is inclusive of all abilities, shade shelters,

both for student and after-hours use by the com-

munity, many configurations of seating areas for so-

cial opportunities, and environments and activities

for students on the autistic spectrum to play and

socialize more comfortably

Real Examples of Change

and Areas Still Lagging

While embraced by private schools like the Mon-

tessori and Waldorf models, the adoption of using

the schoolyard for outdoor education has been at

a slower pace. Although the concept is highly sup-

ported and accepted, for many school districts the

curriculum, maintenance and funding necessary to

support it have been slow to fully develop.

In Colorado, Denver Public Schools has provided

support and funding to implement its innovative

Learning Landscape Schoolyards in each of its 98 el-

ementary schools. Other highly regarded programs

around the nation include the Boston Schoolyard

Initiative and the New York City and Trust for Pub-

lic Land’s Schoolyard to Playground Initiative. Like

these, many other districts and individuals schools

havemade breakthroughs in elementary school-lev-

el outdoor learning opportunities and reconnecting

schools with their communities.

Yet, middle- and high school-level programs have

lagged behind. In Colorado, entities such as the lot-

tery-funded Great Outdoors Colorado and the Colo-

rado Health Foundation have stepped in to provide

sources of funding for outdoor learning initiatives.

Between 2013 and 2016, GOCO has offered a School

Play Yard Initiative grant that “creates safer, more

active play areas and environments for outdoor

learning at schools,” (

Our Grant Programs,

www.

goco.org/grants

).

Championing Schoolyard Learning

and Connections to Nature

I’m proud that we have been champions of ex-

panding the boundaries of learning opportunities

in the schoolyard. In the 1980s, we saved one of the

last sections of undisturbed native prairie for a Jef-

ferson County, elementary school outdoor learning

area and created native learning areas to transition

between the mountainous forest at a new elemen-

tary school in Nederland. In the 1990s, we turned a

Carol Henry,

PLA, ASLA

Principal/

President,

Design

Concepts

ELEMENTS

Schoolyard Design