Previous Page  24 / 28 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 28 Next Page
Page Background

Page 24

— Property Management Quarterly — October 2017

www.crej.com

As most people working in com-

mercial real estate are aware, in

late 2016 Denver passed an energy

benchmarking ordinance that applies

to multifamily and commercial build-

ings 25,000 sf or greater. The ordi-

nance requires commercial building

owners to find out the Energy Star

score of their properties and provide

that information to the city. The ordi-

nance is being rolled out in stages.

In 2017, only buildings 50,000 sf or

larger must participate. Beginning

next year, buildings 25,000 sf and

larger also are included. When fully

rolled out, the policy is expected to

cover around 360 million sf of space

annually.

Our research team found a connec-

tion between other cities that have

enacted similar reporting policies and

an uptick in green building adoption

rates. Nine of the top 10 cities on the

index have implemented benchmark-

ing ordinances, and several of those

cities have seen measurable gains in

green building certifications. Overall,

cities with benchmarking policies

have 9 percent more Energy Star and

LEED certified office buildings and 21

percent higher green-certified office

square footage. While the research

notes that it is too early to call it a

definitive correlation, they do plan to

study the link further in the future.

Holding a green building certification

is not only environmentally responsible,

but also it can be leveraged to attract

buyers and tenants. Denver LEED certi-

fied buildings were very active in 2016

with 333 transactions totaling more

than 3.5 million sf. In terms of property

sales, 13 LEED certified office buildings

traded last year, averaging a 20 percent

premium in price per sf. Of the top 25

leases signed in 2016, five occurred

in LEED certified buildings and seven

occurred in Energy Star buildings.The

largest lease signed last year in metro

Denver – a 357,000-sf renewal by a pre-

mier financial services firm downtown

– occurred in an Energy Star building.

Locating your organization in a green-

certified building also is something

companies can leverage with employ-

ees. According to a Nielsen 2014 Corpo-

rate Sustainability report, 67 percent of

respondents indicated that they would

prefer to work for a socially responsible

company. Further, that preference was

strongest among the millennial popula-

tion surveyed. If a company chooses to

invest in a green-certified space, it can

promote that aspect in its recruitment

efforts to potentially gain an advantage

over its competitors.

In addition to Denver’s benchmarking

ordinance, in November Denver voters

will decide on a new policy called

“The Denver Green Roof Initiative,”

which would require most new

buildings greater than 25,000 sf to

cover at least 20 percent of the roof’s

surface (depending on total building

size) with gardens, solar panels or

other green components. In addition

to new buildings, properties facing

roof replacements also could be sub-

ject to the policy.

It’s too early to say whether the

Green Roof Initiative will pass, but

putting the initiative up for a vote is

indicative of our city’s growing inter-

est in commercial real estate sustain-

ability. At this point, it’s critical that

property owners and property manag-

ers include environmental responsi-

bility in their ongoing dialogue – both

in terms of how to plan around new

policy as well as how to leverage

a building’s green features with

tenants.

s

Sustainability

fixed-rate financing, which, in combi-

nation with the long duration, provides

certainty to building owners. Addition-

ally, C-PACE interest rates are lower

than other forms of alternative financ-

ing, including mezzanine debt or pre-

ferred equity.

Construction financing.

For property

owners who are either building new

construction or completely retrofitting

a building, having to make burden-

some debt service payments before

a building is fully occupied can be a

financial strain. C-PACE can be struc-

tured with “capitalized” interest pay-

ments, which allow the building to

generate income before the first pay-

ment is due from the property owner.

Reimbursement.

Some projects are

time sensitive, such as roof replace-

ments in the winter or a chiller in

the summer. For proper owners who

do not have the luxury of waiting

for financing before starting the

project, C-PACE can be used to reim-

burse building owners for work that

already is completed, allowing them

to replenish their capital reserves or

free up cash flow.

C-PACE financing represents a

unique and innovative structure that

solves problems facing commercial

property owners while filling the

gaps in traditional financing. It does

not involve any government money

whatsoever and since property taxes

are operating expenses, C-PACE is not

debt.

s

Kagan

Continued from Page 6

set your peak demand due to all of

your equipment slamming on at the

same time every morning.

The chart is an example of a

building that was simultaneously

using gas and electric heating in

the winter during morning warm

up, which was setting the demand

charge high. This was a brand new,

third-party commissioned energy-

efficient design, and the manager

could not figure out why the energy

bills were so high. After discover-

ing this issue and making some

programming changes to lock out

electric heat in the morning, the

building owner saved approximate-

ly $3,800 a month, or $20,000 a year

during heating season.

4. Ensure your HVAC isn’t simulta-

neously heating and cooling, which

also is a common issue that goes

unseen in buildings. Check to make

sure your airside economizers are

functioning properly on moderate

days. If you don’t have economizers,

it might not be a bad idea to budget

them into future units so you can

take advantage of the cool outside

air.

If you can, isolate zones – either

with your BAS or with their own

cooling unit – that need special

attention, such as data closets.

Quite a bit of energy is used try-

ing to cool one room while heating

the rest of the building if the zones

aren’t properly isolated.

5. Last, but not least, submetering

your systems (for example, HVAC

vs. lighting, or by different areas in

your building) will help you dig into

where there are issues and oppor-

tunities. Or, at the very least, having

a whole building smart meter tied

into you BAS will help you track

and monitor your energy use every

day in 15-minute increments, rather

than just getting a utility bill once a

month.

There are many strategies out

there, but these are a few to get

started. Hopefully these were help-

ful, and if you have questions on

any of it, there are tons of resources

out here to help.

s

Breeden

Continued from Page 10

pan of 15 to 20 years, so your system

really has to be in the 10- to 14-year

mark if you want to explore a con-

version. If your system is more than

15 years old, your best bet is to plan

for a capital expense to replace the

unit.

The converting of refrigerant also

can create issues for potential buyers

of new buildings. In most cases, the

documentation and maintenance

records for equipment is largely lack-

ing from sellers and it is incredibly

important to know if a building’s

system has gone through a conver-

sion. Buyers need to ask what type of

refrigerant systems are in prospec-

tive buildings and perform an analy-

sis of refrigerant if there is reason to

believe a system has been converted

or contaminated.

If you’ve done the analysis and

determined you have to replace the

system, the next step is working

with a partner who understands the

various options and can help you

develop your financial strategy. Some

owners and managers are using

the Colorado Commercial Property

Assessed Clean Energy program as

an option to perform change outs

of their R22 systems. This strategy

allows for a holistic change out of

systems while still maintaining

positive cash flow but often needs to

occur at the same time as a lighting

retrofit and/or building automation

upgrade.

s

Koenig

Continued from Page 12

Rocky Mountain Trane

This building was simultaneously using gas and electric heating in the winter during

morning warm up, which was setting the demand charge high. After discovering the

issue and making some programming changes to lock out electric heat in the morning,

the building owner saved approximately $3,800 a month.

Continued from Page 1