Previous Page  14 / 28 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 28 Next Page
Page Background

Page 14

— Property Management Quarterly — October 2017

www.crej.com

303-777-7999

palaceconst.com

7 S. Galapago St.

Denver, CO 80223

From

foundations

to

front doors

we are

building

better lives

TM

Commercial

Structural

Restoration

Multi-family

A ordable

Mixed-Use

Senior Living

Education

Healthcare

Hospitality

Retail

Construction Defect Repair

HOA Reconstruction

Structural Repair

Foundation Repair

Window Replacement

Stair Replacement

Historic Renovation

Expert Witness

24/7 Emergency Response

Fire Restoration

Water Mitigation

Mold Remediation

Vehicle Impact

Storm Recovery

Disaster Response

Insurance Repair

since

1963

Management

F

ifty percent of building own-

ers who would be interested

in investing in building energy

retrofits are unable to do so

because of the high upfront

cost, according to a study by Buildings. com. Ironically, the capital for such an

investment is likely hiding in plain sight

in the utility bill – in the form of wasted

energy. Innovative programs are emerg-

ing to unlock that heretofore hidden

investment power.

Energy retrofitting is the science (and,

at times, the art) of improving building

systems after the property is initially

developed – in some cases, decades or

even centuries later. Historically, energy

retrofits have been done only for neces-

sity, and typically one-off instead of

part of a comprehensive plan. A build-

ing system, or “measure” as known in

the industry, wears out and must be

replaced.

Owners traditionally paid cash for

such items, or perhaps entered into

relatively short-term, high-interest

commercial finance loans. In the U.S.,

energy has been relatively inexpensive,

therefore people were not as aware of

the impact of building systems on their

energy consumption, energy bill or the

environment.

Researchers estimate that today, the

nation’s residential and commercial

buildings consume between 37 and 45

percent of the 100 quintillion British

Thermal Units of energy produced in

our country, according to a 2017 report

fromNavigant. In this multitrillion dol-

lar domestic energy market, the U.S.

retrofit market of $70 billion, expected

to grow to $100 billion by 2025, is still a

niche player.

Given this small size and historical

lack of interest, the reason the moment

has arrived for

energy retrofitting

is because there are

major benefits.

Economic

. Ret-

rofits reduce the

consumption and

cost of energy and

improve the operat-

ing income of the

building and overall

value through higher

margins.

Environmental.

Lower consump-

tion yields lower production of harmful

pollutants, carbon dioxide and other

greenhouse gases.

Security.

Reduced demand for

energy, supplemented by locally renew-

able production, helps to balance the

national energy diet, takes stress off the

national grid and reduces our need to

purchase foreign energy.

Customer preference.

Today’s

building owners and tenants are far

more aware of the importance of

energy-efficient buildings than previous

generations and more likely to make

leasing and purchasing decisions based

off that awareness.

To address this missed opportunity,

a variety of financing options emerged

over the last two decades including

Commercial Property Assessed Clean

Energy financing, on-bill financing

(where the repayment is paid to the

utility company) and energy service

companies. However, it should be noted

that if primary bank financing is avail-

able, it will still be the most efficient

form of capital and should be consid-

ered first.

For C-PACE projects, clean energy is

defined as both the investment in ener-

gy-saving building systems as well as

renewable energy-generating systems,

in the same financing package.The

basic concept is that improvements will

generate energy savings over their use-

ful life.Those savings, over the average

life of the measures (ranging from 15 to

30 years), are provided to the building

owners in the present, allowing them to

invest in the improvements that gener-

ate the savings.

The primary innovation is that the

financing is repaid through a special

property-specific assessment, through

the biannual property tax bill.When

designed well, energy savings exceed

the assessment cost, increasing cash

flow from day one. Due to the use of

the property tax assessment mecha-

nism, C-PACE financing is long-term,

nonrecourse and low-rate.

Putting these elements together, the

annual payment, based on term and

interest rate, is significantly lower than

any alternative investment or commer-

cial finance sources, creating cash flow

for the owner fromDay One.

C-PACE is a bipartisan public-private

partnership.While it is still relatively

new – currently available in 18 states,

and in Colorado only since 2016 – and

relatively small, it is on pace for rapid

growth as owners, architects and lend-

ers become more familiar with it.

On-bill financing literally means that

instead of the repayment being made

through the property tax mechanism, it

is made “on-bill” to the utility company,

which already is proficient at collecting

your utility bill. Like C-PACE, the money

saved in energy can be greater than the

increased assessment, yielding imme-

diate cash flow.While these programs

are limited to the use of utility funds,

new on-bill structures will open up the

market to private capital sources, also

like C-PACE. One downside is that only

measures associated with that utility’s

billing can be financed, while C-PACE

can finance the entire building’s mea-

sures.

Energy service companies are in

some ways the grandfather of C-PACE

and on-bill financing and are still rele-

vant and evolving today. Energy service

companies have the benefit of guaran-

teed energy costs, allowing businesses

to lock in prices (and stabilize operating

margins) years in advance.The pro-

gram is incentivized to reduce energy

consumption below a certain baseline.

Federal and municipal agencies, hos-

pitals, schools and universities drive

much of the demand for these services.

Payback periods often are much longer

than commercial periods, reflecting the

longer-term nature of public invest-

ments.

Other options include energy service

agreements, power purchase agree-

ments, managed energy service agree-

ments, as well as energy tax credit

investing – and, in Europe, a trade in

carbon dioxide offset credits.

Energy retrofits are an old tool being

applied in newways by a generation of

innovative owners, developers, finan-

ciers, policymakers and advocates.The

opportunity to save money, protect

the environment, become more self-

sufficient and attract new customers

is more available than ever. Smart

owners and property managers should

put together a package of one or more

of these potential funding sources to

optimize their building’s energy pro-

file, enhance the brand, attract new

customers, and help the state and

the nation become more energy self-

sufficient.

s

Financing options for your retrofit projects

Michael Leahey

Managing director,

PACE Equity,

Denver