Previous Page  23 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

September 2017 — Office Properties Quarterly —

Page 23

www.crej.com

Workplace Trends

Partner with the experts at Swingle today

303.209.7039

TM myswingle.com

Lawn Care | Tree Service | Insect Control | Ash Tree Protection | Holiday Lighting

Colorado’s premiere holiday lighting experts

Stand out from

the crowd this

holiday season

Design and installation

Take-down and storage

Complete maintenance

Energy efficient LED lighting

Premium wreaths and garlands

T

he co-working movement

has arrived in Denver.

WeWork, Industry and Galva-

nize, some of the more well-

known names in the modern

co-working industry, announced

their arrival to Denver in 2015, 2013

and 2012, respectively. As interna-

tional investor interest, commer-

cial real estate development and

office-using employment growth

in Denver has prospered over the

current business cycle, the co-

working industry also has exploded.

There are over 35 different shared

office locations in Denver totaling

approximately 1 million square feet

as of July, according to a local news

source. In addition, multiple new

facilities are under development,

including Industrious and The GRID,

both of which are scheduled for

opening before the new year. These

totals more than triple reports on

the footprint of co-working com-

panies in Denver since the start of

2015.

But should tenants and commercial

real estate professionals expect this

prevalence of co-working options to

sustain – if not grow in significance

and inventory – through multiple

cycles? Some of the traits most com-

monly associated with these work-

places existed long before the term

“co-working” took shape in the busi-

ness world.

Short-term serviced office providers

first emerged in the U.S. in the 1960s,

with companies like OmniOffices,

Stratis Business Centers and the

still-active Regus existing long before

today’s co-working giants. Open and

bullpen-style office plans were pio-

neered by private media and tech

companies before

the year 2000.

The emphasis

on collaboration,

live-work-play and

specialized busi-

ness atmospheres

offered at today’s

co-working facili-

ties have undoubt-

edly brought new

opportunities for

entrepreneurs. In

the last few years

we’ve seen co-

working spaces emerge in Denver

specifically designed with female ten-

ants in mind, a sustainability-focused

space, and even a co-working space

that moonlights as a night club and

art gallery.Women in Kind, founded

by Virginia Santy and Melanie Ulle, is

a prime example of this burgeoning

revolution of co-working founded,

funded and designed by women for

women.

Co-working spaces are tremendous-

ly useful for tenants between leases

or required to have certain business

groups in close proximity to a specific

client. In addition to startups and

freelance professionals, we’ve seen

sizable companies assign teams to

co-working space to work on specific

projects that require separation from

the larger workforce or benefit from

the services and atmosphere offered

by co-working providers.

The question remains: Is co-work-

ing the best option for tenants seek-

ing a startup or collaborative work

space? Not necessarily. There are

benefits to business objectives and

negotiating ability that growing busi-

nesses lose or see diminished when

not taking up private space or utiliz-

ing the services of a tenant represen-

tation adviser.

For one, it’s vital for any growing

business to secure and retain propri-

ety information and top talent.While

the ability to frequently collaborate

with outside parties within a co-

working space can facilitate creativ-

ity and a rewarding work experience

for employees, feedback from clients

on the co-working experience often

focuses on concerns that competitors

can easily poach talent and intellec-

tual property.

Furthermore, when striving to

maintain a specific organizational

culture and values – something that

often is a top priority for a company

in a real estate transaction – outside

influences presented in a shared

space can be a challenge. Is it impos-

sible to achieve these business objec-

tives regarding talent retention, intel-

lectual security and corporate culture

at a co-working space? No. Neverthe-

less, these challenges are important

considerations businesses must

review when evaluating workplace

options.

There are costs when working with

a tenant adviser to secure space that

businesses avoid when going the

co-working route. However, a ten-

ant adviser provides a wide range of

services to clients leading up to and

after their client commits to a lease

that co-working tenants are unable

to take advantage of. These services

include workforce strategy analy-

sis to determine what location and

real estate decisions are required to

attract and retain top talent, reduce

operating costs and foster innovation.

They also serve as representation in

lease negotiations to leverage the cli-

ent’s position in the market for eco-

nomically favorable lease terms, con-

cessions and tenant improvements

agreed to be implemented by the

landlord.When represented by a ten-

ant adviser, the representative con-

stantly evaluates the client’s business,

industry and office market to identify

opportunities to scale for growth and

improve efficiency by negotiating for

lease restructure or expansion, or

subleasing excess space to another

business.

Looking forward, it’s hard to bet

against co-working facilities having

some kind of sustained role in the

Denver office market for years to

come. It will be the job of commer-

cial real estate professionals to help

growing companies eliminate the

gray area for when a business should

utilize a co-working facility and

when they should scale up to private

space.

s

Factors for the co-work vs. private space debate

Ashley Elkin

Assistant director,

Savills Studley,

Denver

These challenges

are important

considerations

businesses must

review when

evaluating workplace

options.