Previous Page  45 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

December 7-December 20, 2016 —

COLORADO REAL ESTATE JOURNAL

— Page 45

T

he success of a project is

often measured by cost and

schedule. Projects live and

die by the budget at which

they are set. No bank funds a

bottomless project and no corpora-

tion embarks on a project without a

well-vetted business plan; one that

has taken into account the budget-

ary considerations of all the major

parts. While we see the financial

and scheduling aspects as undeni-

ably important, we want to discuss

the value realized when a true team

is engaged. A powerful roadmap

to success is created when there

is a focus on people, relationships,

understanding, collaboration, flex-

ibility, trust and respect.

In order to realize greater suc-

cess, we must begin by establishing

a solid foundation. This founda-

tion begins when we ask what we

are trying to accomplish internally

and externally and why. We ask

ourselves the following questions:

Can we get our team moving in the

same direction? Can we construct

in an active campus and minimize

impacts to daily operations? Work-

ing in a health care facility, can

we positively affect patient safety,

cleanliness and quality? Can we

work respectfully, maintain collec-

tive responsibility and maximize

effort? Our focus must move outside

of our walls and our specific tasks

and pushes the team farther. We

push father by asking ourselves still

more questions: What is the goal

of the facility? Where is it located?

What is it adjacent to? How does it

enhance their programs and help

their community?

How does it affect

existing systems?

How does it affect

daily operations?

Perhaps most

important of these

is, “How do we

connect with the

owner and archi-

tect?”

We live in a world

of perceptions,

especially those of

our clients. Clients

often feel that they

must choose between their architect

and their contractor. The percep-

tion is often that the contractor and

the architect or designer are in an

adversarial relationship. In reality,

this can and should be no further

from the truth. The best projects

are those where a strong team is

formed between the owner, the con-

tractor and the architect. Nowhere is

it more critical than in the world of

architecture and construction that

the two responsible for the creation

of the owner’s vision come together

and function in harmony.

Recently, there have been several

projects where we have worked

with an architect on the front-end

program, design and cost model-

ing. In these scenarios, the architect

consulted the facility to determine

the best path to meet the end

goal. Based upon requirements for

replacement of equipment and the

sequence needed to keep the facility

in operation, a plan was developed.

The architect had in-depth knowl-

edge of the spe-

cialty equipment,

code analysis and

functionality of the

department. Cata-

mount was brought

in early to validate

logistics, infection

prevention and

cost analysis of

the options. To do

this, the architect

and Catamount

both set aside their

individual focus

for the greater pur-

pose of finding the

right solution for the facility. With

both entities working in concert to

provide guidance, with ego and indi-

vidual bias taken out of the process,

a greater level of achievement was

met.

A strong relationship is not imme-

diate. Trust is built over time. In

construction, which comes with

inherent conflict and stereotypical

roles, it may take even longer. Our

business is set up with barriers. The

relationship between the contrac-

tor and architect has checks and

balances, but this does not mean

it has to be adversarial. Teams do

need, however, to take ownership

of their roles and responsibilities.

We succeed when these roles are

well defined. Despite these defined

relationships, conflict always can

be resolved between two people if

there is a relationship of trust. Ulti-

mately, any facility we work with

benefits from a strong relationship

between the design team and con-

tractor. The facility reaps an even

greater reward when they are part

of the trusting team.

The key to a successful team

starts with a mindset of wanting

more, of trying to understand the

people on the team. You must get

beyond the project, the schedule

and the solution, and move beyond

black and white to see the value in

the shades of grey. Set priorities,

provide guidance and listen. Hold

one another accountable and, at the

same time, hold each other up.

In a recent meeting at a facility,

the question was asked about why

an existing condition that was not

piped correctly was left in place

without review. We discussed the

mentality of hard bidding projects,

quick schedules and working with

blinders. It illuminated a failure in

teamwork and an understanding of

the greater goal of looking out for

one another. It was a missed oppor-

tunity. What followed, however,

began to build the next level in our

relationship as a team. It was agreed

upon to get in a room with the

design team, contractor and facil-

ity, setting egos aside, to review the

scenario and how we could work

better going forward. While this

may sound like a simple step, there

was a moment of understanding,

a moment of trust and a moment

of knowing that going forward our

team would be better.

The ability to truly use the team

to their best capacities in a project

comes with trust over time. Take the

time. True success comes when it’s

all about the team.

s

An elevated definition of project success

Chad Cleveland

Project executive,

Catamount

Constructors Inc.,

Denver

John Menno

Nap, AIA,

LEED AP

Principal, Path21

Architecture,

Denver

Health Care & Senior Housing Spotlight