Page 16
— Property Management Quarterly — July 2017
www.crej.comMaintenance
Serving
Property Professionals
Since 2003
303-789-0016 for 24 hr. Emergency Service
metrostatefire.comFire Alarm & Sprinkler System Testing & Inspection
We Service All Makes of Fire Alarm Systems
Emergency Services & De ciency Repairs
New Construction Engineering & Design
Tenant Finish Fire Alarm & Sprinkler
S
ome of you may have noticed
that ash trees are no longer
for sale at many nurseries
throughout Colorado.The rea-
son is no bigger than a penny,
but has killed over 50 million ash trees
across 29 states.
It is known as emerald ash borer,
which currently is threatening ash
trees in two Colorado communities –
Boulder and Longmont. It is not neces-
sarily a matter of if, but rather when,
it will spread to neighboring cities and
beyond.
For property managers, EAB can be
cause for alarm on many levels. First
and foremost, your job is to maintain
the overall beauty and appearance
of the property. EAB does not make
that an easy task once it has infested
ash trees because the canopies die off
quickly as the nutrient and water sup-
plies are cut off from the trunk of the
tree.
Additionally, trees that are evaluated
and ultimately identified for removal
pose a safety risk to patrons and ten-
ants. Having those trees removed and
replanted is costly, and the process of
finding a new tree species to replace a
beloved ash trees can been daunting.
I’m often asked what are suitable
and desirable tree to take their place.
Ash trees, (fraxinus pennsylvanica and
fraxinus americana) green and white
ash, respectively, were once a popular
tree choice because they were easy to
establish in our dense Colorado soil,
grew quickly and provided beautiful fall
colors.
Because of these characteristics, they
were overutilized in our landscapes.
Reaching almost 40 to 60 feet high, ash
trees also made the perfect shade tree
in backyards, parks and commercial
properties.
Since the discovery
of EAB in Boulder
County, requests for
recommended alter-
natives are increas-
ing.This is not an
altogether easy
question to answer.
There are a few
factors to consider
when deciding on a
tree, including:
• How long does it
take for the tree to
grow large enough
to start providing
shade?
• Does the prospective tree have any
obvious insect or disease problems?
• Are there frustrating characteristics
like messy fruit to clean up?
•What are the desirable features of
the tree?
Since there is no such thing as the
“perfect tree,”we then have to weigh
the advantages versus the disadvan-
tages of each. Here is what I think.
I do not want a tree that grows fast.
Faster-growing trees are softer-wooded
trees, which are prone to snow dam-
age.Welive in an area that is subject
to heavy, wet snowstorms early in the
fall and late in the spring. I want a tree
that will be resilient to snowstorms, yet
grow reasonably quick so it won’t take
a generation to enjoy some shade.
I want a tree that has few, if any,
insect or disease problems to avoid
having to pour money into maintain-
ing it. I want a tree that does not have
messy or unpleasant smelling fruit that
would add to my maintenance chores. I
want a tree that adds value to my land-
scape and one that has visual appeal.
And I want it to be able to survive Colo-
rado’s weather extremes.
Luckily, there are trees that meet all
of these demands. However, the expo-
sure – what side of the building it will
be located on – is something we need
to determine before planning.
Since well over 90 percent of land-
scape plantings are not native to Colo-
rado, doing some research into where
the tree is indigenous is helpful.Trees
that optimally grow in Colorado must
be from a location that is cold hardy.
Most trees that are “pleasing to the
eye” are delicate.Trees with attractive
and unique flowers, such as eastern
redbud or magnolia, need protection
from the intense heat, which occurs on
a typical south- or west-facing expo-
sure. Many of the trees with attractive
red or orange fall colors cannot tolerate
a south- or west-facing exposure as
well.
The best trees for this brutal south-
or west-facing exposure are notoriously
not fancy.They include:
• Hackberry
• Honeylocust
• Linden
• Buckeye
• Horsechestnut
• Coffeetree
• Elm
• Silver maple
• Catalpa
• Hawthorn
• Sycamore
• Planetree
• Ornamental pear
• Members of the white oak
family
For less brutal locations, such as
an east- or north-facing exposure,
possibilities include:
• Whitespire birch
• Purple and tri-color beech
• Sugar maple, red maple, wasatch
maple and Norway maple
• Red oak, scarlet oak and ‘Texas
red’ oak
• Serviceberry
• Redbud
• Yellowwood
• Tulip poplar
• Japanese pagoda tree
• Hornbeam
• Gingko
• Alder
And finally, there are some trees I
would not place into consideration
… ever! These include any species
of:
• Willow
• Cottonwood
• Russian olive
• Tree-of-heaven
• Sumac
• Buckthorn
• Chokecherry
• Siberian elm
• Boxelder
• Mulberry
s
The best alternatives to plant in place of ash treesTony Hahn
Landscape care
consultant, Swingle
Lawn, Tree &
Landscape Care,
Denver
Red maples need protection from intense
heat, making them ideal for east- or north-
facing exposures.