Previous Page  20 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

Page 20

— Property Management Quarterly — April 2017

www.crej.com

Maintenance

Irrigation: Efficient practices for sustainable results

T

he efficiency of an irrigation

system is dictated by many

factors, including human,

mechanical and environmen-

tal components,” according

to WaterSense, a U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency partnership pro-

gram. “Implementing mechanisms

and practices that increase an irri-

gation system’s efficiency could

save a property more than half of

its outdoor water use. Eliminating

waste requires trained professionals,

appropriate irrigation schedules and

efficient technologies.”

In Colorado, and other arid West-

ern states, it is generally accepted

that 50 percent of municipal water

use is attributable to landscape irri-

gation.

The case for conservation

. Irri-

gation waste carries a high price.

Municipal water used for irriga-

tion can range in price from $5 per

1,000 gallons to potentially $15 per

1,000 gallons along the Front Range,

depending on water purveyor and

specific rate structures. Irrigation

excess often accounts for 20 to 40

percent or more of landscape water

requirements.

As an example, consider a Front

Range landscape where the season-

al water requirement (water budget)

is 10 million gallons. This would

be a typical seasonal budget for a

site with approximately 550,000 to

600,000 square feet of irrigated land-

scape. In this example, 25 percent

excess (waste) will come at a cost of

more than $17,000 annually for this

site when the billable rate is $7 per

1,000 gallons. Addi-

tional costs, not as

easily measured,

are those associ-

ated with excess

water accumula-

tion on nonperme-

able surfaces. Run-

off, puddling and

water collection on

asphalt and other

impervious sur-

faces shortens the

life expectancy of

these surfaces.

Increased irriga-

tion efficiency will reduce water

collection on surfaces where water

adds no value and, typically, does

harm. Efficient irrigation and proper

management also contribute to

more predictable and, therefore,

more manageable water and irri-

gation service-related expenses.

Budget overruns and expensive sur-

prises can greatly be reduced, if not

eliminated.

Additionally, plant health and

visual appeal improve when plants

receive the correct amount of water,

at the correct time. And let’s not for-

get social responsibility. We all owe

some responsibility for conservation

and resource stewardship.

Achieving Irrigation Efficiency

Proper management is a criti-

cal component to achieving water

conservation objectives. With the

accelerated rate of new technology

introduction, management plays an

even more important role in achiev-

ing desired results.

Irrigation man-

agement is more

than just repairs; it

includes responsi-

bility and account-

ability for a water

budget derived

from a given land-

scape’s seasonal

water requirement.

An effective man-

agement plan is

comprised of many

parts.

Irrigation assess-

ment (audit).

Begin

with the end in mind. An irrigation

assessment becomes the road map

that outlines the actions and initia-

tives that should be undertaken to

improve the performance and over-

all efficiency of an irrigation system.

The assessment will produce the

information needed to calculate the

landscape water requirement (water

budget) for the property. In many

instances, a seasonal landscape

water budget may already exist.

The assessment also should prior-

itize efficiency improvements based

on payback opportunity. Irrigation

system improvements/upgrades do

not all deliver the same return on

investment.

Additionally, the assessment can

be an initiative that produces a

map, typically plotted on a satel-

lite image, showing locations of

key irrigation system components

and potentially other assets. A map

becomes a very useful tool at a time

of management and/or service pro-

vider change.

Implementation.

The irriga-

tion assessment, in and of itself,

produces no water savings or effi-

ciency gains. All too often, we see

examples of audits and assessments

completed with no action taken

on any recommendations. Given

the costs associated with water

waste and inefficiency, irrigation

Free estimates | in business since 1970

www.coatingsinc.net

303-423-4303

AsphAlt And tennis Court MAintenAnCe

• Infrared repaIr

• CraCksealIng

• sealCoatIng

• tennIs Court resurfaCIng & MaIntenanCe

Brian Bair

Owner and

president, ET

Irrigation,

Lakewood

Robert Olson

Director of

business

development,

ET Irrigation,

Lakewood

ET Irrigation

ET, or evapotranspiration, is the sum of

the water used by a plant (transpiration)

and water lost due to evaporation.