Previous Page  28 / 112 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

28

/ BUILDING DIALOGUE / MARCH 2015

Private Offices: A Concept That Isn’t DOA After All

D

o you have a “real” office? The kind with

fixed walls, a ceiling and an actual door? Do

you need one, want one, lust after one?

If so, why? Is it a status thing? Is it about comfort,

privacy, productivity, silence? Or all of the above?

In a business world dominated by “open” work

places, you’d certainly be in the minority if you did

land yourself a private office.

In fact, a recent study by the International Facility

Management Association noted that approximately

70 percent of current U.S. offices are designed with an

open plan of some kind, which may include low par-

titions, no partitions or “communal” tables or benches.

This is not a newsflash for anybody in the office de-

sign industry. But could this “trend” possibly signal the

eventual extinction of the fixed office? Hardly, even if

the data may suggest otherwise.

For starters, the cumulative success of open plans is

perpetually up for debate, especially lately. The narra-

tive keeps changing as new data unearths confusing

or contradictory feedback from primarily open system

work places. One reason for this is the dizzying array

of commercial furniture products available in today’s

marketplace, and how they are employed in any given

space. So the term “open plan” is not a one-size-fits-all

solution in any event. In general, however, these prod-

ucts are designed to reduce the real estate footprint,

lower construction costs and, in theory, boost produc-

tivity in office spaces without fixed walls.

This is not happening, however, especially not to

the satisfaction of business owners who have sharply

transitioned to the open office without fully taking the

pulse of the company’s culture. (Maybe stripping away

all those private offices wasn’t such a great idea after

all.) The impact is that office workers in open plans are

pushing back and pushing back hard. Does this mean

that a significant subgroup of those people lost their

private offices after a remodel or move? Absolutely.

While we don’t have the hard data to support that

just yet, local anecdotal evidence is everywhere we look.

One seasoned executive here refused to partake in

any design discussions that included a workstation for

himself, even though his superior – the company presi-

dent – agreed to buy into the concept. For the executive,

it was a private office or nothing. He got the office – the

only one in the space – because it was in the company’s

best interest to accommodate him, and keep him. This

doesn’t always happen, of course.

A senior Denver office broker’s boutique firm was

acquired by one of the global giants, which granted pe-

rimeter offices only to regional and national directors.

Despite his misgivings, he accepted the position and

Katie Bisgard

Senior

Project

Manager,

Kieding

TRENDS

in Private Office

Following the North Star

The U.S. Air Force Academy’s new

Center for Character and Leadership

Development topped out in January, with

the final truss placed atop the skylight.

Architect: Skidmore, Owings & Merrill

LLP. Construction: ECC; concrete services

and field supervision, GH Phipps.

Corporate Office

5995 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

303.571.5377

Colorado Springs, Colorado

496 Nevada Mesa View

Colorado Springs, CO 80907

719.633.4673

Fort Collins, Colorado

4800 Innovation Drive

Fort Collins, CO 80525

970.776.5500

Laramie, Wyoming

3840 Fort Misner Lane

Laramie, WY 82073

307.745.4866

www.GHPhipps.com

1-877-5PHIPPS

INSPIRE LEAD DELIVER

Photo by GH Phipps

©SOM