Previous Page  33 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 33 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

March 18-March 31, 2015 —

COLORADO REAL ESTATE JOURNAL

— Page 33

Law & Accounting

C

olorado has set the legal

and policy standards

for implementation of

the legalization of medical and

recreational marijuana sale and

use. In its first report, the Colo-

rado Department of Revenue's

Marijuana Enforcement Division

indicated that in 2014 nearly

$700 million of medical and rec-

reational marijuana was sold in

Colorado and at the end of 2014,

322 retail stores were licensed,

833 licenses were issued to retail

businesses in general and 1,416

medical marijuana businesses

were approved by the state.

All of the licenses involve a

real estate component. Repre-

senting a party in a commercial

real estate transaction related to

the marijuana industry requires

additional due diligence and

documentation of the transac-

tion, regardless of whether the

party is a tenant, landlord, seller,

buyer, lender or developer con-

nected to real property – docu-

ments that paper real estate

transactions should be revised

to reflect changes in state law

regardless of whether or not the

transaction involves medical

or recreational marijuana if the

drafting party wants to control

the use of its real property. It

is not sufficient to rely on the

generic no violation of law cov-

enants in documents to control

the use of the property.

Additional provisions, cov-

enants and representations are

necessary to protect all of the par-

ties to the transaction. No other

industry has the tension between

state law and federal law that

could potentially result in dra-

matically different outcomes at

the state level compared with

the federal level. Until marijuana

is removed as a Schedule 1 drug

from the Controlled Substances

Act, this tension will remain and

the papering of the deal requires

addressing head-on the addi-

tional issues created by this ten-

sion. All aspects of the marijuana

industry remain illegal under

federal law and are beyond the

scope of this article.

Assuming the represented

party has compliedwith the state

law requirements for medical or

retail marijuana, (See Colo. Rev.

Stat. §§ 12-43.3-101 to 1102 and

recreational marijuana, Colo.

Rev. Stat. §§ 12-43.4-101 to 1101,

the “Act”), and understands

the risks of

the potential

liability for

violations of

the federal

law, due dili-

gence is still

required by

all parties to

the transac-

tion to protect

its interests.

Henny Penny

may be right;

the sky may

be falling, but isn’t that when it

is most important to have all the

ducks in a row?

Due diligence items to

consider related to the

property

n

Encumbrances.

Review all

encumbrances recorded against

the property. Is the property held

free and clear or is it encum-

bered by a loan? Are there cov-

enants and other conditions that

restrict the use of the property?

If the property is encumbered

by a mortgage, both landlord

and tenant should review the

mortgage and loan documents to

determine if the use is prohibited

by the documents. If the docu-

ments are silent with respect to

prohibiting amarijuana use, each

party will have to determine its

threshold for risk given the mul-

titude of federal laws that are

implicated in the financing and

banking aspects.

n

Zoning and local law com-

pliance.

Of the 321 jurisdictions

in Colorado, only 67 allow the

sales of medical and recreational

pot, 21 allow only medical sales,

while five allow only recreational

sales. The majority of jurisdic-

tions prohibit medical and rec-

reational sales. If the property is

located in a jurisdiction that per-

mits the desired use, the property

must still be zoned to permit the

use, whether it is retail, medi-

cal, cultivation, manufacturing or

testing.

n

Physical condition of prop-

erty.

Most buildings are not

designed for any marijuana use.

This is an area in which working

with an industrial design consul-

tant who understands the specif-

ic needs of the use would benefit

both the owner of the property

and the tenant.

n

Licensing requirements.

In addition to the act, regula-

tions enforced by the MED dic-

tate licensing requirements. All

parties should understand the

various steps, necessary docu-

ments to obtain a license and the

implications of failing to obtain

a license for the parties and the

transaction.

n

Insurance.

Each party

should determine whether the

policies required to be carried by

it adequately provide coverage as

required by the transaction and

sufficiently cover the risks.

Various documents

n

Lease Issues.

Tenants should

insist that the use provision state

the licensed marijuana use is

permitted under the lease. The

landlord and tenant each need

the right to terminate the lease,

but for different reasons. Both

parties will want the right to ter-

minate if federal policy changes

to enforce the CSA in the states

that have legalized marijuana. If

the license is lost, each party may

want the right to terminate, again

for different reasons. The lease

should also address security

issues, alterations to the property,

abandonment and other issues

related to furniture, fixtures and

equipment. The guaranty or

other security also will be a criti-

cal issue to landlords.

n

Loan documents.

Any per-

son making a loan secured by

real property in Colorado should

review his documents to include

affirmative and negative cove-

nants related to the intended use

of the property.

n

Purchase and sale agree-

ments.

Consider the implications

in a sale of property that has been

used for a marijuana use or will

be used for a marijuana use on

the disclosures and representa-

tions in the purchase agreement

to protect the represented party.

Additionally, numerous other

documents such as covenants

and restrictions and recorded use

restrictions in deeds or easement

agreements may be required to

document how the owner of the

property desires to control the

use.

Parties involved in the transac-

tion will benefit from upfront

due diligence and thorough

documentation of the parties’

intent with regard to use of the

property.

s

Documentation and due diligence to avoid the Henny Penny effect

Amy Brimah

Managing partner,

Brimah LLP, Denver

6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle

Suite 1000

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

Phone (303) 796-2626

Fax (303) 796-2777

www.bfwlaw.com

Deals. Litigation. Great Service.

Merc Pittinos

mpittinos@bfwlaw.com

Matt Dillman

mdillman@bfwlaw.com

Abe Laydon

alaydon@bfwlaw.com

Attorneys at Law