MARCH 2016 \ BUILDING DIALOGUE \
49
prepunched openings, are also a critical part of a proactive
structural strategy.
Aesthetics (Exposed Structure).
The final look and feel of a build-
ing’s aesthetics, where the architectural goal is to leave the
structure exposed, should be explored early as well. In cases
where the structure is designed to be a part of the architec-
ture itself, the selection of structural systemmaterials and de-
tails, which would traditionally be hidden, must be carefully
thought out. Important questions include: Does it help tell the
story or become part of the architecture? Does it provide a raw
industrial feel using exposed concrete and/or steel, or warmth
to the space with exposed timber? And how do we accomplish
maximum possible transparency with minimal or no glazing
mullions in both exterior and interior glass walls?
Constructability.
Site constraints often direct a team to utilize a
particular structural system due to natural synergies with the
construction method. Thus, to assure speed and economy of
the building process, it is important to determine, in advance,
potential issues like: buried obstructions or utilities that may
need to be spanned over to avoid expensive relocation costs;
the need for integration of structure with shoring or other
temporary works; or panelization/modularization systems that
would potentially limit crane use.
Sustainability/Life Cycle Cost/Ease of Reuse/Demolition.
If a project
has elevated LEED orWELL goals, structural systems must drive
toward these goals from the onset of the design process. Ques-
tions like “Does the use of new technology or processes help
achieve these goals?” go a long way toward coming up with the
right solutions before the design is set in stone.
Bottom line?
Exploring ideas and options with a structural en-
gineer during the early phases of a project not only helps the
design team guide it down the right path, it limits compro-
mises to the architect’s original vision. This approach elevates
teammembers’ understanding of a project’s parameters, which
allows the highest-quality design and most cost-effective out-
come for the client to emerge.
\\
Photo courtesy Davis Partnership,
in association with Ron Faleide Architects
Our Lady of Loreto Parish School in Foxfield achieved a
very dynamic design on a very tight budget through highly
integrated structure, architecture and MEP. (Structural en-
gineering services by Studio NYL.)
Photo courtesy EHDD, architect,
in association with Coburn Partners
Boulder Commons' net zero offices had an extremely tight building height limit, which required prepunched beam open-
ings with MEP HVAC services within beam depths to provide owner, Morgan Creek Ventures, maximum possible head-
room. (Structural engineering and façade consultancy services by Studio NYL.)
Best Practices
